8 generative engine optimization best practices your strategy needs
Despite what the headlines would have you believe, artificial intelligence (AI) isn’t new. The term and early technology date back to the 1950s, but generative AI (which emerged in the 2010s) is undeniably new terrain.
Despite what the headlines would have you believe, artificial intelligence (AI) isn’t new. The term and early technology date back to the 1950s, but generative AI (which emerged in the 2010s) is undeniably new terrain. With both leaving their mark on consumer search behavior, marketing strategies like generative engine optimization (GEO) are not just becoming popular but essential. But that doesn’t mean generative trauma ensues. Let’s unpack how your business and marketing team can navigate the changes, unknowns, and competition with generative AI SEO best practices. Table of Contents Generative engine optimization (GEO) is about making your website and content easy for AI-powered search tools (like ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity) to find, understand, and cite. When someone asks one of these tools a question, the AI systems scan content across the web to create an answer. It doesn’t give you a list of resources that could be helpful, like search engine optimization, but it aims to directly answer your question while citing websites it thinks are reliable. GEO helps your content get chosen as one of those lucky resources. TLDR: SEO gets you on the party guest list (SERP). GEO gets you a VIP seat and a shoutout from the DJ (Citation). Ok, so SEO is clearly different from GEO, but what about AEO? Answer engine optimization (AEO) is closely related to GEO, but there's a distinction worth understanding. AEO targets direct-answer features that have been around for a while; think featured snippets in Google, knowledge panels, and voice assistant responses. It's about showing up in those quick-answer boxes. Generative engine optimization, on the other hand, focuses specifically on newer AI tools that generate original responses by combining information from multiple sources. It helps you be one of those sources. Overall, many tactics work for both goals (and even SEO), but GEO requires extra attention to how you structure information and establish credibility so AI systems feel confident citing your work. Let’s not get it twisted: GEO isn't replacing SEO. Rather, it’s extending it for a world where AI plays a bigger role in how people discover information. The marketers who figure this out early will have a significant advantage. (So, if you’re reading this, congrats! You’re in good company.) BrightLocal research shows that Google still drives 61% of all general searches, but AI platforms are noticeably growing as destinations where people start their research. In fact, according to GWI, 31% of Gen Zers already say they use AI platforms or chatbots most frequently to find information online, and Gartner even predicts that 40% of B2B queries will be handled by an answer engine by the end of the year. Add the prevalence of voice assistants like Siri and Alexa on our smartphones and in our homes, and the need to evolve is even more apparent. A list of links isn’t always helpful to users; they want synthesized, actionable answers with clear sources they can trust. That’s where generative engines come in. If you don’t invest in GEO now, you could be missing out on all of these possibilities — but this challenge isn’t a bad thing. GEO just demands we level up. AI tools ultimately prioritize quality, and the best way to compete is to just keep delivering more and better value in your content. Tools like HubSpot's Content Hub can help by making it easier to create structured, well-organized content that aligns with GEO best practices. Regardless of the tools you use, here are some best practices for generative engine optimization you use to put your best foot forward. AI systems love resources that get straight to the point. In other words, they favor content where the information they need isn’t buried. That said, start each section by directly answering the target question as concisely as possible (aim for fewer than 300 words), then expand with context and details. Think of it like this: if someone pulled out just one paragraph from your article, would it make sense and answer their question on its own? That‘s what you’re aiming for. Answer the question first, then explain the nuances. This is how you should approach writing for AI search in general — clarity first, depth second. Here at HubSpot, we’ve been experimenting with “summaries” at the beginning of our articles to accomplish this: Pro tip: Use the “inverted pyramid” approach to writing journalists lean into: Put the most important stuff at the top, supporting details below. This makes it easy for AI to find and extract your main points accurately. You can also use HubSpot's Content Hub to create templates that enforce this answer-first structure across all your content, so it becomes automatic. Sometimes when you’re reading about complicated topics, it’s easy to lose the thread. Maybe you’re reading an explanation of X and Y and how they relate to Z, but suddenly you’re unsure whether the last sentence was about Z or X or something else entirely. AI systems are similar in a way. They process and cite content by recognizing its subject matter, like specific people, places, companies, and concepts. Depending on the context, vague references in your content can confuse AI and reduce your chances of being cited. For example, saying “The company launched it in 2024,” may leave AI systems asking, “What company?” Instead, you’d want to write "HubSpot launched Content Hub AI in 2024,” so AI gets the details right. Keep these clarity best practices in mind when writing for generative engine optimization: GEO is just as much about what’s off the page as what’s on the page. That means keeping your website running smoothly and organized in a way that AI can understand, with strong technical SEO is critical to getting found and cited. Here’s what you can do: Schema markup is backend code that explains what your content is about in a way that's crystal clear to AI systems. According to Schema.org statistics, pages with properly implemented schema are processed more accurately by AI systems because there's no ambiguity about their meaning. There are countless different types of schema, but don’t get overwhelmed. Focus on these types first for the most common “query” impact: Test your schema using Google's Rich Results Test to catch any errors that might confuse AI systems. Both AI systems and search engines consider site performance a trust signal. Slow, broken sites are deprioritized because they're seen as lower quality and, frankly, deliver a worse user experience. That’s the last thing anyone wants. That said, use tools like Google PageSpeed Insights and GTmetrix to find and fix website performance issues. I popped Apple in as an example, and even giants like it have room for improvement. Pay special attention to maintaining: Pro Tip: Use HubSpot's CMS to automatically handle many technical requirements for fast, AI-friendly websites (e.g., mobile responsiveness and security). To learn more about optimizing your site speed, you can also check out our articles, “Here’s How I Measure Website Speed and Guarantee Performance (+Tips)” and “19 Website Speed Optimization Strategies [New Data].” While traditional metadata targets search result pages, GEO-optimized metadata helps generative search quickly understand and accurately summarize what your content covers. In today’s search landscape, you ideally want to appeal to both. With that in mind: AI systems often use well-written meta descriptions and data as the foundation for understanding your content and retrieving information. As a user, I’ve definitely seen my share of AI hallucinations and odd citations, but to their credit, most AI systems make an active effort to check whether websites actually know what they're talking about before citing them. So, how can yours make the cut? Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness (E-E-A-T) has been around for a while now, but it is still important in the AI age. It’s actually the core evaluation criterion that AI systems (and Google) use to assess the credibility of sources. In other words, strong E-E-A-T signals dramatically increase the likelihood of citations. Strengthen yours by adding: According to Google's Quality Rater Guidelines (updated regularly through 2024), expertise and trustworthiness are the primary ways to evaluate content quality — and AI systems are trained using these same standards. Another part of establishing credibility is showing a deep understanding of your industry, product, and desired area of expertise. Here’s how: One way tools evaluate subject-matter expertise is by looking for comprehensive coverage of a specific topic across your website and content. For example, think of how HubSpot covers digital marketing and business growth, and Healthline covers wellness. Research from Clearscope shows that thorough content (2,500+ words with comprehensive topic coverage) received 3.2x more AI citations than shorter, surface-level pieces. Semrush also found that comprehensive, well-sourced content earns 77.2% more backlinks than shallow content, which helps both your GEO and traditional SEO performance. So, go deep. That means: Bottomline: AI systems prefer sources that thoroughly address a topic rather than providing quick, incomplete answers. Credibility and comprehensive coverage typically happen naturally over time with consistency, but you can help it along. Consider creating pillar pages on your core topics, then supporting articles that go deep into specific aspects under that umbrella. For example, if your pillar topic is “email marketing,” create supporting content on segmentation, automation, deliverability, metrics, and platform comparisons. From there, strategically link the pieces together. Linking is fundamental to effective content optimization in the AI era, as it signals to AI and search engines that pages are related. Make sure each piece leads back to the pillar and the pillar down to each piece. The goal is to be complete. Hobbyists scratch the surface. Experts go deep. Pro tip: Topic clusters and pillars can get complicated. Use HubSpot's topic cluster tool in Content Hub and Marketing Hub to map out your content and spot gaps where you might be missing important pieces. Research from Princeton and Georgia Tech found that content with relevant images, charts, and videos got 40% more AI citations than text-only content. That’s a big advantage, but why exactly? Not only do visuals make content more engaging and memorable for your audience, but they also help AI systems understand context. They also signal that you've put real effort into making information accessible and clear from many different angles. It’s a sign of being thorough, and AI loves thorough. In your content, include: (This article is a good example of this tip in action.) Don’t you hate it when AI sounds like a robot? Ironically, it hates that too. AI systems are trained on conversational questions and natural language. Content that's overly formal, technical, or stuffed with keywords is harder for AI to interpret and cite accurately. Write as if you're explaining something to a smart colleague who may be new to the topic: This conversational style isn‘t just better for GEO — it’s also more engaging for human readers, improving your content performance across the board. Pro Tip: If you’re using AI to actually write your content, make sure to edit and humanize it before publishing. Search engines and AI engines claim they don’t penalize AI-generated content, but they do penalize unoriginal content, which is an inherent risk with AI tools. More on that shortly. Freshness matters enormously for GEO. AI systems prefer recent content as it’s more likely to be up to date. Content Marketing Institute's 2024 research found that organizations publishing weekly or more often had AI citation rates 67% higher than those publishing monthly or less often. Build a content refresh strategy: Content that hasn't been touched in over 18 months is much less likely to be cited, no matter how good it originally was. The mistake: Switching between different names for the same thing (like “HubSpot,” “the company,” “the platform,” “it”) without enough context, or using pronouns when it's unclear what they refer to. Why it hurts: AI systems identify specific people, places, and things to understand and recommend content. Vague references create confusion, preventing potential citations. Fix it fast: The mistake: Publishing content without schema markup, using outdated formats, or implementing it incorrectly so it doesn't work properly. Why it hurts: AI systems use schema as a reliable way to understand your content. Missing or broken schema can affect how AI interprets what you're saying. Fix it fast: The mistake: Linking to unreliable sites, news aggregators, or research from before 2024 when current information is available. Why it hurts: AI systems evaluate the credibility of sources. Weak or outdated citations signal low-quality content that shouldn't be trusted. Fix it fast: The mistake: Using AI-generated content directly without adding a unique perspective, original research, your brand voice, or expert input. Why it hurts: AI systems recognize and downrank generic, AI-generated content that lacks original value. Ironically, AI-written content often doesn't perform well for GEO. Fix it fast: HubSpot’s brand voice tool can help with this. Read: How to humanize AI content to rank, engage, and get shared The mistake: Creating content and never revisiting it, even as information becomes outdated or new developments happen. Why it hurts: AI systems heavily favor recent content. Stale information is skipped in favor of fresher sources, even if your original content was of higher quality. Fix it fast: The mistake: Publishing content without author information, credentials, or organizational background that helps AI systems evaluate trustworthiness. Why it hurts: AI systems are trained to assess credibility based on an author‘s expertise and an organization’s authority. Anonymous or poorly attributed content is treated as less trustworthy. Fix it fast: Read: Professional Bio Examples: 29 Work Bios I Keep in My Back Pocket for Inspo [+ Templates] The mistake: Implementing GEO tactics without measuring whether they're increasing AI citations, traffic from AI platforms, or brand mentions. Why it hurts: You can‘t improve what you don’t measure. Without tracking, you might waste time on things that don't actually help. Fix it fast: The mistake: Tailoring content to a specific tool (i.e., ChatGPT or Perplexity) without considering how the landscape is changing. Why it hurts: The AI search world is evolving fast. Platform-specific tricks might not work as new systems emerge, and existing ones change. Fix it fast: No, GEO isn‘t replacing traditional SEO; it’s complementing it. Search engines still drive the majority of website traffic, so SEO is critical. Plus, a lot of GEO, and AEO for that matter, is rooted in the same criteria as search engines. All of them prioritize quality content, credible sources, technical excellence, and user value. The main difference is that SEO focuses on ranking in search results, while GEO focuses on getting cited by AI tools that create synthesized answers. The smartest approach combines both strategies. When you implement GEO best practices like thorough content, strong sources, clear language, and structured data, you're also strengthening your traditional SEO. Think of GEO as SEO evolving for a world where AI plays a bigger role, not as a replacement. You'll typically start seeing GEO results within 4-12 weeks of implementation, though timing varies based on your existing content quality, site authority, and the extent of your optimization. Quick wins (2-4 weeks): Medium-term results (2-3 months): Long-term gains (6+ months): Unlike traditional SEO, where ranking changes can take months, GEO can show results faster because AI systems continuously update their source preferences. That said, building sustainable GEO performance requires the same long-term commitment to quality that SEO demands. TLDR: Getting more citations from AI tools requires a combination of content quality, technical setup, and strategic positioning. Key citation drivers: According to research from Arizona State University published in 2024, the strongest predictors of AI citations are content depth, source authority, and technical quality — not keyword stuffing or link volume. Tactical approach: Start with your highest-authority content (based on backlinks, traffic, and engagement), then optimize those pieces first with GEO best practices. This creates momentum that extends to newer content as AI systems recognize your site as reliable. If you're just getting started with schema for GEO, focus on these four types that deliver the biggest impact: 1. Article schema: Tells AI systems about your content type, author, publication date, and headline. This is the foundation for all editorial content. 2. Organization schema: Establishes who you are and why you should be trusted as a source. 3. FAQ schema: Maps directly to how people ask AI tools questions, making your content highly relevant for conversational searches. 4. Breadcrumb schema: Helps AI understand how your content connects and relates, important for showing comprehensive coverage. After getting these core types in place, expand to a more specialized schema: Use Schema.org as your reference guide, and validate your implementation using Google‘s Rich Results Test. HubSpot’s Content Hub includes built-in schema tools that simplify implementation without needing technical expertise. The core GEO best practices work universally, but how you implement them should match your resources, scale, and organizational structure. Enterprise GEO workflows should emphasize: SMB GEO workflows should focus on: The goal is the same regardless of organization size: create trustworthy, well-structured content that AI systems cite. The path just needs to fit your resources and setup. I get it. While AI is technically not new, it feels like it is. With answer engines and generative engines, we’ve never seen artificial intelligence at this level or so easily accessible to the general public. But don’t let the marketing tabloids scare you. Your old SEO playbook isn’t useless; in fact, much of generative engine optimization is rooted in the same principles. Start with your most important content, get the technical foundations right (like schema and clear language), and commit to keeping your expertise fresh, current, and valuable. Organizations that treat GEO as a strategic priority rather than a checkbox will maintain their visibility as search continues to evolve. Ready to implement these GEO best practices at scale? HubSpot's Content Hub provides integrated tools for creating, optimizing, and measuring AI-ready content without needing a technical team.
What is generative engine optimization?
GEO vs AEO
Why generative engine optimization matters now

Generative Engine Optimization Best Practices You Can Implement Today
1. Lead with clear, direct answers


2. Be specific about who and what you’re talking about
3. Optimize the technical elements of your website
Add Schema Markup

Keep your website fast and functional

Optimize your metadata
4. Establish credibility

5. Showcase deep subject matter expertise
Make your content comprehensive
Create pillar pages

6. Include images, videos, and other visual content
7. Write like a real person to a real person
8. Publish regularly and keep content fresh
Common Generative Engine Optimization Pitfalls (and How to Avoid Them)
1. Being vague or inconsistent about who/what you're discussing
2. Skipping schema markup or implementing it wrong
3. Citing questionable or outdated sources
4. Publishing AI-written content without editing
5. Never updating or revisiting content
6. Leaving out author credentials and authority signals
7. Not tracking whether your GEO efforts are working
8. Over-optimizing for specific AI platforms
FAQs About Generative Engine Optimization Best Practices
Is generative engine optimization replacing traditional SEO?
How long does it take to see results from GEO?
How can I get cited by AI tools more often?
What schema should I start with for GEO?
Do I need separate GEO workflows for enterprise and SMB?
Generating Generative Success
Tekef